This dashboard shows results from the Berkeley Interpersonal Contact Survey (BICS) in Spring 2020.
Caveats / underway:
These results show the national and city samples pooled together
the values presented here do not yet have principled uncertainty estimates. That is coming soon!
This project has been approved by the UC Berkeley IRB (Protocol 2020-03-13128).
# A tibble: 16 x 6
# Groups: ego_age [4]
ego_age alter_age bics fb ratio frac_decrease
<chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 [25,35) [25,35) 1.09 7.16 0.152 0.848
2 [25,35) [35,45) 0.502 2.36 0.212 0.788
3 [25,35) [45,65) 0.452 1.25 0.363 0.637
4 [25,35) [65,100] 0.112 0.173 0.648 0.352
5 [35,45) [25,35) 0.513 3.29 0.156 0.844
6 [35,45) [35,45) 1.30 5.87 0.222 0.778
7 [35,45) [45,65) 0.367 1.70 0.215 0.785
8 [35,45) [65,100] 0.202 0.528 0.383 0.617
9 [45,65) [25,35) 0.320 2.23 0.143 0.857
10 [45,65) [35,45) 0.415 3.10 0.134 0.866
11 [45,65) [45,65) 0.941 3.77 0.250 0.750
12 [45,65) [65,100] 0.322 0.755 0.426 0.574
13 [65,100] [25,35) 0.221 0.737 0.300 0.700
14 [65,100] [35,45) 0.321 2.14 0.150 0.850
15 [65,100] [45,65) 0.449 2.00 0.224 0.776
16 [65,100] [65,100] 0.787 2.17 0.362 0.638
TODO
Respondents to the survey were told to consider someone a contact using this text:
We would like to ask you some questions about people you had in-person conversational contact with yesterday.
By in-person conversational contact, we mean a two-way conversation with three or more words in the physical presence of another person.
You might have conversational contact with family members, friends, co-workers, store clerks, bus drivers, and so forth.
(Please do not count people you contacted exclusively by telephone, text, or online. Only consider people you interacted with face-to-face.)